[Rails] Re: Re: Ajax Scaffold Generator for Rails Released
Richard White
rrwhite at gmail.com
Wed Mar 1 03:41:57 GMT 2006
Or even 'ajax_scaffold_rails_generator' .. but nevertheless you make a
very valid point. I wish I had thought of that before I created all the
packages (I know I could go back and change them, but I don't really
wanna deal with the confusion that would cause).
Adam Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:18:44PM +0100, James Byrne wrote:
> [...]
>> # gem install ajax_scaffold_generator --remote
>>
>> and everything needed for ajax_scaffold_generator will be identified and
>> downloaded for you (after you consent).
>>
>> Installing gem now will make extending and maintaining ruby and rails
>> much easier for you later.
>
> It occurs to me after using a bunch of these - why are the rails gems
> not labeled as such?
>
> There are lots of gems, and many of them are generic ruby
> packages. Perhaps we could encourage people who make gems for rails to
> specify that they're rails-specific in the names.
>
> It would be much clearer if this was rails_ajax_scaffold_generator.
>
>
> --
> - Adam
>
> ** Expert Technical Project and Business Management
> **** System Performance Analysis and Architecture
> ****** [ http://www.everylastounce.com ]
>
> [ http://www.aquick.org/blog ] ............ Blog
> [ http://www.adamfields.com/resume.html ].. Experience
> [ http://www.flickr.com/photos/fields ] ... Photos
> [ http://www.aquicki.com/wiki ].............Wiki
> [ http://del.icio.us/fields ] ............. Links
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
More information about the Rails
mailing list