[Rails] Re: Re: Ajax Scaffold Generator for Rails Released

Richard White rrwhite at gmail.com
Wed Mar 1 03:41:57 GMT 2006


Or even 'ajax_scaffold_rails_generator' .. but nevertheless you make a 
very valid point. I wish I had thought of that before I created all the 
packages (I know I could go back and change them, but I don't really 
wanna deal with the confusion that would cause).

Adam Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:18:44PM +0100, James Byrne wrote:
> [...]
>> # gem install ajax_scaffold_generator --remote
>> 
>> and everything needed for ajax_scaffold_generator will be identified and
>> downloaded for you (after you consent).
>> 
>> Installing gem now will make extending and maintaining ruby and rails
>> much easier for you later.
> 
> It occurs to me after using a bunch of these - why are the rails gems
> not labeled as such?
> 
> There are lots of gems, and many of them are generic ruby
> packages. Perhaps we could encourage people who make gems for rails to
> specify that they're rails-specific in the names.
> 
> It would be much clearer if this was rails_ajax_scaffold_generator.
> 
> 
> --
> 				- Adam
> 
> ** Expert Technical Project and Business Management
> **** System Performance Analysis and Architecture
> ****** [ http://www.everylastounce.com ]
> 
> [ http://www.aquick.org/blog ] ............ Blog
> [ http://www.adamfields.com/resume.html ].. Experience
> [ http://www.flickr.com/photos/fields ] ... Photos
> [ http://www.aquicki.com/wiki ].............Wiki
> [ http://del.icio.us/fields ] ............. Links


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.


More information about the Rails mailing list